Dating diret com
The Domain entirely incorporates Complainant’s mark with the addition of either the descriptive word “sex”. Indeed it would not have been credible if the Respondent, a UK based operator of a dating website, had denied knowledge of the Complainant given that the Complainant is a major player – if not the market leader -(ii.) 4b(iv): By using the domain name, Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to Respondent’s web site or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of Respondent’s web site or location or of a product or service on Respondent’s web site or location. Forum July 31, 2000) (holding that the respondent’s failure to respond allows all reasonable inferences of fact in the allegations of the complaint to be deemed true); see also Talk City, Inc. Complainant has asserted that it has spent almost £10 million on marketing, advertised in national magazines, newspapers, specialty magazines, on television, national and local radio, posters, leaflets in health clubs, and on billboards, and spent considerable money to establish high priority on search engines. COM mark among Internet users as to the source of broadcast services); Bibbero Sys., Inc. The word does not disguise the fact that the dominant feature of the Domain is the DATING DIRECT mark, and is therefore confusingly similar to that mark. The use of the preceding word “sex” before the Complainant’s trade mark is intended by the Respondent to create a likelihood of confusion in the minds of the public as to an association between the Respondent and the Complainant. Check out our top 10 list below and follow our links to read our full in-depth review of each uk dating website, alongside which you'll find costs and features lists, user reviews and videos to help you make the right choice. With over 5 million UK members Dating has someone for everyone. Well don’t be afraid, we’re not putting any pressure on you! is one of the most – if not THE most – well known and relied upon internet dating websites there is, and it’s... 11, 2003) (“Respondent registered a domain name confusingly similar to Complainant's mark to divert Internet users to a competitor's website. Welcome to our reviews of the Best UK Dating Websites of 2019. Whatever you’re looking for from a dating website, we think we’ve found it in UK. “Sometimes to get what you want you have to be direct” is the mantra of Dating Direct.com, one of the UK’s largest and most effective dating websites.
Our singles nights and events give members the opportunity to get together at venues near them and share a drink, enjoy an activity and get to know each other.
Their tagline is “dating for thinking people” and though this isn’t always the case it seems to attract a lot of students and young professionals to its shores....
Encounters Dating (brought to you by The Times and The Sunday Times) is a dating site for people who really are looking for a relationship. They'll bombard you with emails but refuse a trial membership. Just avoid, they gave me no confidence that this is a legit company. Unfortunately the users on the website are very unresponsive, the customer support is nonexistent ( I sent quite a few emails and received no response whatsoever!! (Read the full review) I have been a member of this site twice, having not quite learned my lesson the first time.
Indeed the name “Sex Dating Direct” appears prominently on the top of the home page as well as in the meta title and website text, thereby adding to likely confusion on the part of visitors reaching the site.
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules instructs this Panel to "decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable." In view of Respondent's failure to submit a response, the Panel shall decide this administrative proceeding on the basis of Complainant's undisputed representations pursuant to paragraphs 5(e), 14(a) and 15(a) of the Rules and draw such inferences it considers appropriate pursuant to paragraph 14(b) of the Rules.
Search for dating diret com:
The Complainant’s solicitors sent a cease and desist email, on 12 July 2005, to the Respondent to which the Registrant responded as follows: ”there are many thousands of domain names out there that use 'direct' in there domain names. The Complainant also relies on the fact that, as explained below, the Respondent clearly set out to attract business intended for the Complainant. nor the suffix ‘.com’ detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy ¶4(a)(i) is satisfied)Mutiplex Case, the Top-pile Case, the Turner Case and the Bailey Case) mentioned in paragraph 19 where a descriptive word added to the Complainant’s trade mark did not diminish confusing similarity. The Respondent declined to offer an explanation for its registration of the Domain in its written response to the Complainant’s cease and desist letter (other than to claim that “there are many thousands of domain names out there that use 'direct' in there domain names”). 4, 2000) (finding that the complainant has common law rights in BROADCASTAMERICA. Forum May 9, 2000) (finding, while the complainant had registered the BIBBERO SYSTEMS, INC.